Reynolds 2018.
| Study characteristics | ||
| Methods |
Study design: prospective, multicentre, randomised, parallel‐group, open‐label clinical trial Study grouping: parallel group Total duration of the study: December 2015 to May 2018 Duration of follow‐up: completed follow‐up through either 30 days or the occurrence of a study endpoint Number of study centres and location: 18 study sites in the US |
|
| Participants |
Inclusion criteria: for prospective apixaban cohort were aged ≥ 18 years and scheduled for catheter ablation for the treatment of non‐valvular AF, with a planned continuation of OAC for minimum 1 month after the procedure Exclusion criteria: people with mechanical heart valves, advanced hepatic or renal (CrCl < 15 mL/minute or on dialysis) dysfunction, ongoing or planned dual antiplatelet therapy, history of stroke or TIA within 6 months, history of prior intracranial bleeding, significant baseline anaemia or thrombocytopenia Total number of participants: 306 Number of randomised participants: 300 Number lost to follow‐up/withdrawn: 5 Number of analysed participants: 295 Number of participants in each treatment group: minimally interrupted apixaban: 145; uninterrupted apixaban: 150 Baseline characteristics Interrupted anticoagulation
Uninterrupted anticoagulation
Group differences: no significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between groups |
|
| Interventions |
Periprocedural anticoagulation
Ablation procedure
Intraprocedural anticoagulant
|
|
| Outcomes | Endpoints were assessed from the time of randomisation for 30 days Primary safety endpoint
Primary efficacy endpoint
Secondary endpoints
|
|
| Notes |
Investigators' conflicts of interest: not reported Funding: Baim Institute for Clinical Research with financial support from Bristol‐Myers Squibb and Pfizer Country: US Setting: 18 study sites in US Comments: none Author's name: Matthew R Reynolds Institution: Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts Email: matthew.reynolds@baiminstitute.org Address: Baim Institute for Clinical Research, 930 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 |
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Methods of randomisation not described. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of allocation concealment not reported. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) all outcomes | High risk | Open‐label study. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) all outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "all potential endpoints were reviewed and adjudicated by an independent endpoints committee. Other procedure‐attributable adverse events not meeting endpoint criteria were reviewed by safety officers of the study sponsor as well as the principal investigators." |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) all outcomes | Low risk | Participants flow chart was provided. Attrition was explained and all endpoint analyses were conducted on the evaluable patient population, which included all intention‐to‐treat participants who were randomised. |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Outcomes reported matched published protocol (NCT02608099). |