Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;9:e12036. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12036

Figure 3. Comparison of biomarkers, enterotypes, and KEGG pathways between Tibetan and Han women.

Figure 3

(A) LEfSe analysis results for the HI and TI1st groups; LDA score was set to 2.0. (B) Comparison of enterotype between HI and TI1st groups, P > 0.05, χ2 = 4.97. (C) The significantly different KEGG pathways between the HI and TI1st groups, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01.