Table 3.
Summary of Hypotheses 1–4 results.
| Variables | Career adaptability | Proactive career behavior | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | SE b | β | b | SE b | β | |
| Controls | ||||||
| Gender | −0.06 | 0.06 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Age | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.11 | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.05 |
| Education | 0.04 | 0.05 | −0.06 | −0.02 | 0.04 | −0.03 |
| Title | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08 | −0.02 | 0.04 | −0.03 |
| Tenure | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Working years | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Independent variable | ||||||
| Promotion focus | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.40*** | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.23*** |
| Prevention focus | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Mediator | ||||||
| Career adaptability | 0.40 | 0.14 | 0.43** | |||
| Indirect effect | ||||||
| Promotion focus → career adaptability → proactive career behavior | 0.13** | 0.06 | ||||
| Prevention focus → career adaptability → proactive career behavior | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||||
| R2 | 0.20** | 0.07 | 0.41*** | 0.09 | ||
N = 247.
Model fit statistics: χ2 (67) = 125.52, CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04. b = unstandardized coefficient; SE, standard error; β, standardized coefficient.
Bootstrap = 5,000.
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.