TABLE 3.
Scanner comparison - T1w image | Affine similarity (mean ± SD) | WM/GM contrast (mean ± SD) | Max scale factor (mean ± SD) |
Intra-scanner variability | |||
Achieva | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
Ingenia | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
GE | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.00 |
Inter-scanner variability | |||
Achieva – Ingenia | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.00 |
Ingenia – GE | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.00 |
Achieva – GE | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 1.01 ± 0.00 |
The scanner models of the considered image pairs, irrelevant of order, i.e., irrelevant of which image is considered as reference. Affine similarity: mean ± SD of the affine similarity index where >0.2 corresponds to a reliable affine similarity index. WM/GM contrast difference: The absolute difference in WM/GM contrast-to-noise ratio (mean ± SD), with a threshold of acceptability between 0.1 and 0.2. Max scale factor: The mean ± SD of the maximum scaling factor over the three spatial directions, where a value of 1.00 indicates that no scaling is needed, and 1.01 indicates 1% scaling is required. Note that the standard deviation is approximately 0, showing that the scaling needed in pairwise comparisons is subject-independent.