Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;130(2):498–507. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00745.2020

Table 1.

Simulated effect of a decrease or increase in chosen parameter values by 10% in relation to “standard” (100%) values on selected variables

Parameter Relative Parameter Value O2max, mM·min−1 AUTcrit, unitless t0.63, s
kOX −10% 11.9 (–10.2%) 67.1 (–10.2%) 26.5 (+8.2%)
100% 13.3 74.7 24.5
+10% 14.7(+10.5%) 83.3 (+10.5%) 22.8 (–6.9%)
AOXmax −10% 12.2 (–8.4%) 69.4 (–7.1%) 26.8(+9.4%)
100% 13.3 74.7 24.5
10% 14.4 (+8.6%) 81.0 (+8.4%) 22.5 (–8.2%)
Pipeak −10% 11.1 (–16.2%) 66.6 (–10.8%) 24.5 (--)
100% 13.3 74.7 24.5
+10% 15.7 (+18.1%) 84.5 (+13.1%) 24.5 (--)
Picrit −10% 13.3 (--) 71.5 (–4.3%) 24.5 (--)
100% 13.3 74.7 24.5
+10% 13.3 (--) 78.7 (+5.4%) 24.5 (--)
kadd −10% 13.3 (--) 72.1 (–3.5%) 24.5 (--)
100% 13.3 74.7 24.5
+10% 13.3 (--) 77.5(+3.7%) 24.5 (--)

t0.63 was simulated for ATP usage activity AUT = 40 (moderate exercise). AOXmax, each-step activation (ESA) intensity; AUTcrit, critical ATP usage activity (corresponding to critical power); kadd, activity (rate constant) of the additional ATP usage; kOX, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) activity; Picrit, critical Pi at which the additional ATP usage (and thus the slow component of the V̇O2 and metabolites) appears; Pipeak, peak Pi at which exercise is terminated because of exercise intolerance; V̇O2max, maximal V̇O2; t0.63, characteristic transition time of the V̇O2 on-kinetics (analogous to τp).