Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 19;106(11):e4641–e4651. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab454

Table 3.

Ranking of risk factors and models (sets of risk factors) for type 2 diabetesa

Risk factor or model Ranking by MIP MIP θ^ CE Ranking by PP PP θ^ λ
Model averaging using 12 SNVs (including rs1800562, rs1799945, rs855791, rs8177240, rs7385804, rs744653, rs651007, rs411988, rs9990333, rs4921915, rs6486121, rs174577)
Iron 4 0.177 0.008 4 0.17 0.05
Ferritin 1 0.305 0.023 1 0.293 0.082
Transferrin saturation 3 0.266 0.017 3 0.254 0.061
Transferrin 2 0.27 –0.015 2 0.264 –0.056
Model averaging using 9 SNVs (excluding invalid instruments rs651007, rs174577, rs4921915 with Q statistic > 10)
Iron 4 0.089 0.004 4 0.08 0.052
Ferritin 1 0.532 0.074 1 0.519 0.14
Transferrin saturation 2 0.268 0.015 2 0.257 0.055
Transferrin 3 0.131 –0.006 3 0.125 –0.043
Model averaging using 8 SNVs (excluding influential instrument rs1800562 with Cook’s distance exceeding the threshold)
Iron 4 0.15 0.002 4 0.143 0.017
Ferritin 1 0.488 0.04 1 0.477 0.083
Transferrin saturation 2 0.214 0.008 2 0.206 0.035
Transferrin 3 0.164 –0.004 3 0.158 –0.026

Abbreviations: MIP, marginal inclusion probability; MR, mendelian randomization; MR-BMA, MR based on Bayesian model averaging; PP, posterior probability; SNV, single-nucleotide variation (formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism [SNP]); T2D, type 2 diabetes.

a Results were generated using the MR-BMA approach. In total, 4 genetically instrumented biomarkers of systemic iron status were assessed as risk factors. All the risk factors and the best individual models with a PP value greater than 0.02 were presented. A negative causal estimate (θ^MACE or θ^λ) indicates a protective effect as suggested by the model, whereas a positive value indicates a risk factor. θ^λ is the causal effect estimate for a specific model and θ^MACE is the model averaged causal effect of a risk factor.