Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Genet. 2021 Apr 24;51(6):619–630. doi: 10.1007/s10519-021-10059-7

Table II.

Model fit comparisons within the full bivariate ACE model examining qualitative and quantitative sex differences.

Model Model Description Estimated
Parameters
−2LL df AIC Δ(−2LL) Δdf p Comparison
Model
1 Sex limitation, qual. on A and quant. sex-differences 25 28985.38 10940 7105.38 NA NA NA NA
2 Sex limitation, qual. on C and quant. sex-differences 25 28986.23 10940 7106.23 0.85 0 NA 1
3 Scalar sex limitation, quant. sex-differences 20 28986.93 10945 7096.93 1.55 5 0.91 1
4 Homogeneity, no qual. nor quant. sex-differences 13 29003.10 10952 7099.10 17.72 12 0.12 1
4 Homogeneity, no qual. nor quant. sex-differences 13 29003.10 10952 7099.10 16.17 7 0.02 3

Note: Models 1-4 include common paths for correlated factors a, c, and e. A=Additive genetic component, C=Common/Shared environmental component, E=Unique environmental component, qual.=qualitative, quant.=quantitative. Best fitting model is designated in bold text. All five twin groups are included in the modeling (MZ female, MZ male, DZ female, DZ male, DZ opposite sex). Best fitting model denoted in bold.