Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Aug 4;121(11):2233–2241.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.009

Table 5.

Healthy Eating Index-2015 total scores based on observed and reported intake, by education and body mass index, among women in FEASTa II (2016, n=302)b, carried out in Washington, DC area

Education Observed Reported Difference (SE)d P-valued
Mean (95% CI)c
Some or completed high school or GED (n=89) 62.6 (60.9, 64.3) 65.8 (63.5, 68.2) −3.2 (1.1) <0.01
Completed some college (n=123) 64.0 (62.6, 65.4) 65.3 (62.9, 67.7) −1.3 (0.97) 0.18
Completed college (n=88) 63.4 (61.9, 65.0) 64.6 (62.1, 67.3) −1.2 (1.1) 0.29
 
BMI (kg/m2)
<25 (n=101) 63.7 (62.2, 65.4) 65.3 (62.7, 68.0) −1.6 (1.1) 0.13
25≥29.9 (n=71) 63.9 (62.2, 65.6) 65.5 (62.7, 68.2) −1.6 (1.1) 0.15
≥30 (n=118) 62.5 (61.0, 63.9) 65.3 (62.9, 67.7) 2.8 (1.1) 0.01
a

FEAST, Food and Eating Assessment Study.

b

FEAST II participants who completed Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) recalls in the independent and assisted conditions were pooled into one group. Education information was missing for 2 participants and BMI was missing for 12.

c

Healthy Eating Index-2015 scores were calculated using the population ratio method.

d

Standard errors and differences in scores derived from true and reported intake were constructed using a Monte Carlo approach based on macros available from the National Cancer Institute (https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/hei/sas-code.html). T-tests were used to determine if each difference was different from zero.