Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 21;11:20853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00358-8

Table 3.

Results of hierarchical regression analyses.

Step 1 Step 2 ΔR2
PP SP TA R2 PP SP TA PP × SP PP × TA SP × TA
Standardized coefficients Standardized coefficients
Gain αP  − 0.175 0.069  − 0.013 0.024  − 0.222  − 0.008 0.019  − 0.048 0.129 0.196 0.063
αN 0.212  − 0.210 0.321† 0.092 0.196  − 0.230 0.385*  − 0.238 0.004  − 0.095 0.071
β 0.256  − 0.346† 0.440** 0.161* 0.234  − 0.394* 0.490**  − 0.154 0.099  − 0.014 0.015
κ  − 0.074 0.112  − 0.188 0.027  − 0.104 0.156  − 0.225 0.112  − 0.302 0.293† 0.083
Loss αP  − 0.157 0.384*  − 0.074 0.097  − 0.183 0.279  − 0.061 0.052 0.337† 0.136 0.187*
αN 0.069  − 0.062 0.036 0.004 0.103 0.015  − 0.019 0.143  − 0.176  − 0.046 0.027
β 0.170  − 0.251 0.229 0.054 0.129  − 0.376† 0.354*  − 0.379* 0.329†  − 0.115 0.108
κ 0.133  − 0.149 0.128 0.021 0.086  − 0.208 0.214  − 0.283 0.037 0.031 0.060

Note PP = primary psychopathy, SP = secondary psychopathy, TA = trait anxiety, αP = learning rate for positive PE, αN = learning rate for negative PE, β = inverse temperature, κ = subjective utility parameter. †p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.