Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 21;11:20796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00256-z

Table 5.

Effects of requiring vaccination and psychological reactance on intentions, perceived benefits, norms, fairness, and obligation: Study 4.

Requirement
Yes No
Vaccination intention
All participants 3.59 (0.07) 3.36 (0.07)
Participants with lower reactance (− 1SD of the mean) 3.70 (0.09) 3.45 (0.10)
Participants with higher reactance (+ 1SD of the mean) 3.48 (0.10) 3.26 (0.09)
Perceived benefits
All participants 3.41 (0.04) 3.39 (0.05)
Participants with lower reactance (− 1SD of the mean) 3.63 (0.06) 3.44 (0.06)
Participants with higher reactance (+ 1SD of the mean) 3.18 (0.06) 3.33 (0.06)
Perceived norms
All participants 3.32 (0.04) 3.31 (0.04)
Participants with lower reactance (− 1SD of the mean) 3.47 (0.06) 3.38 (0.06)
Participants with higher reactance (+ 1SD of the mean) 3.17 (0.06) 3.24 (0.06)
Perceived fairness
All participants 3.28 (0.06) 3.30 (0.07)
Participants with lower reactance (− 1SD of the mean) 3.54 (0.09) 3.43 (0.09)
Participants with higher reactance (+ 1SD of the mean) 3.02 (0.09) 3.17 (0.09)
Perceived obligation
All participants 3.28 (0.06) 3.41 (0.06)
Participants with lower reactance (− 1SD of the mean) 3.58 (0.08) 3.53 (0.09)
Participants with higher reactance (+ 1SD of the mean) 2.98 (0.09) 3.29 (0.08)

Table entries are means and standard errors (parenthetically) obtained from analyses of covariance.

Intentions were measured on a 1–5 scale, where 1 = extremely unlikely, 2 = somewhat unlikely, 3 = neither likely nor unlikely, 4 = somewhat likely, and 5 = extremely likely.