Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 21;11:20752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99653-7

Table 2.

Results of regression analysis for prediction of preferred WHR and BMI for short-term and long-term relationships, separately in female and male participants.

Educaional background SQ EQ Digit ratio Age
Males’ short-term preference 
BMI
 Beta 0.201 − 0.018 − 0.044 − 0.154 − 0.016
 p-value 0.009* 0.822 0.586 0.039* 0.833
WHR
 Beta − 0.086 0.032 0.074 − 0.063 − 0.136
 p-value 0.263 0.687 0.365 0.40 0.081
Males’ long-term preference
BMI
 Beta 0.131 0.0050 − 0.067 − 0.060 − 0.085
 p-value 0.092 0.949 0.415 0.43 0.28
WHR
 Beta − 0.050 0.123 − 0.164 0.072 − 0.052
 p-value 0.518 0.122 0.045* 0.339 0.504
Females’ short-term preference
BMI
 Beta − 0.182 − 0.0090 − 0.020 − 0.154 0.078
 p-value 0.034* 0.917 0.82 0.070 0.355
WHR
 Beta − 0.124 − 0.142 0.029 − 0.067 − 0.091
 p-value 0.152 0.114 0.743 0.434 0.285
Females’ long-term preference 
BMI
 Beta − 0.073 0.0080 0.077 − 0.114 0.152
 p-value 0.40 0.931 0.385 0.184 0.077
WHR
 Beta 0.0030 − 0.060 0.0080 − 0.0050 − 0.074
 p-value 0.974 0.508 0.929 0.954 0.398

*p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.