TABLE 3.
Latent variable: Level of psychological comfort.
Level of psychological comfort | Effect (β) | |||||
|
||||||
a | b | Direct (c) | Indirect (ab) | Total (c + ab) | ||
Low | −0.383 (−0.492; −0.273)*** | −0.016 (−0.158; 0.126) | 0.175 (0.036; 0.314)* | 0.006 (−0.048; 0.061) | 0.181 (0.053; 0.309)** | |
Moderate | −0.192 (−0.343; −0.041)* | 0.123 (−0.036; 0.282) | 0.046 (−0.114; 0.206) | −0.024 (−0.059; 0.012) | 0.022 (−0.136; 0.181) | |
High | −0.401 (−0.522; −0.281)*** | 0.234 (0.078; 0.39)** | 0.129 (−0.029; 0.287) | −0.094 (−0.164; −0.024)** | 0.035 (−0.114; 0.185) |
Standardized results of regression analyses performed on the total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect in group of Polish ECD’s (N = 546).
a – effect stress on self-efficacy; b – effect self-efficacy on burnout; c – direct effect stress on burnout; ab – indirect effect stress on burnout via self-efficacy; combined effect stress and self-efficacy on burnout, total (c + ab) – total stress relationship with burnout, including indirect relationships through self-efficacy. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; and *p < 0.05.