Table 3.
Robustness of the RD Results by Gender
| Baseline (1) |
10-day Window | Excl. North. Italy | Excluding Portugal | Excluding Spain | Controlling for cases | Logistic transformation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | ||
| Stay at home | − 12.95*** (0.459) | − 8.99*** (0.424) | − 12.82*** (0.548) | − 14.42*** (0.440) | − 13.04*** (0.454) | − 11.69*** (0.469) | − 0.62*** (0.024) |
| Women × stay-at-home | − 3.24*** (0.353) | − 3.07*** (0.431) | − 3.07*** (0.442) | − 3.58*** (0.403) | − 3.79*** (0.149) | − 3.25*** (0.352) | − 0.13*** (0.018) |
| Observations | 14,102 | 7,228 | 11,150 | 12,052 | 10,742 | 14,098 | 14,291 |
| R-squared | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
Notes: The table reports the coefficients of an interaction term between the gender dummy and stay-at-home variable. All regressions include the gender dummy, a variable for the number of days since the introduction of the stay-at-home order, the interaction terms of the latter with the stay-at-home variable and with the gender dummy, and province and day-of-the-week fixed effects. Column (6) considers a 20-day window and controls for the moving average of daily COVID-19 cases. Standard errors are clustered at the province level. ***, **, *