Table 1.
Face memory tests that have been used to identify super-recognisers in at least two empirical papers.
| Task | Reliability | Frequency used (% of
studies) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applied (N = 13) |
Theoretical (N = 12) |
Overall (N = 25) |
||
| CFMT+ | α = .89 a | 8/13 (61.54) | 12/12 (100.00) | 20/25 (80.00) |
| MMT | α = .89 a | 1/13 (7.69) | 2/12 (16.67) | 3/25 (12.00) |
| BTWF | Not available | 0/13 (0.00) | 2/12 (16.67) | 2/25 (8.00) |
| AFRT | Not available | 1/13 (7.69) | 1/12 (8.33) | 2/25 (8.00) |
CFMT+: Cambridge Face Memory Test—Long Form (Russell et al., 2009); MMT: Models Memory Test (Bate et al., 2018); BTWF: Before They Were Famous test (Russell et al., 2009); AFRT: Adult Face Recognition Test (Belanova et al., 2018).
Reliability and frequency of use are reported for each test.
a
Reliability estimates for these tests are not available in the published literature and were calculated for this article from the 200 self-referred super-recognisers published in Bate et al. (2018).