Table 1: Summary of the Design and Outcomes of the DIRECT and DIRECTAVI Trials.
| Trial | Devices used | Study design and no. of participants | Outcome | Results | Postdilation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECT 2019[16] | CoreValve (11.7%) Evolut R (83.6%) Evolut Pro (4.7%) |
Study design Multicentre open-label RCT Participants n=171
|
Primary endpoint Device success defined by VARC-2 criteria Secondary endpoint In-hospital or 30 day
|
Primary endpoint Device success
Mean difference 2.1%; 90% CI [−8.9%, 13%] Secondary endpoints Stroke (p=0.32)
New permanent pacemaker (p=0.54)
Major vascular complications (p=0.49)
|
p=0.03 |
| DIRECTAVI 2020[17] | Edwards Sapien 3 (100%) |
Study design Prospective, single-centre, open-labelled RCT Participants n=236
|
Primary endpoint Device success at 72 h defined by VARC-2 criteria Secondary endpoints
|
Primary endpoint Device success (p=0.02 for non-inferiority)
Mean difference 4.5%; 95% CI [−4.4%, 13.4%] Secondary endpoints Length of procedure (p=0.31)
Radiation exposure (p=0.24) Contrast volume (p=0.97)
Hospitalisation length (p=0.90)
All-cause mortality (p=0.24)
Stroke (p=0.99)
Major bleeding (p=0.70)
AKI stage 2–3 (p=0.37)
Pacemaker implantation (p=0.72)
|
p=1.00 |
AKI = acute kidney injury; BAV = balloon valvuloplasty; RCT, randomised controlled trial; TAVR = transcatheter aortic valve replacement; VARC = Valve Academic Research Consortium.