Table 1.
Respondents who agreed or strongly agreed with each item on the postcourse survey.a
| Survey item | All (N=232), n (%) | MD 2022 (n=81), n (%) | MD/MPH 2022 (n=39), n (%) | MD 2023 (n=112), n (%) | P valueb |
| Osmosis videos were easy to access | 230 (99.1) | 80 (98.8) | 39 (100.0) | 111 (99.1) | .40 |
| Osmosis video quality (audio, visuals, and other technical aspects) was acceptable | 226 (97.4) | 76 (93.8) | 38 (97.4) | 112 (100.0) | .01 |
| The Osmosis videos were helpful to my learning | 204 (87.9) | 64 (79.0) | 34 (87.2) | 106 (94.6) | .001 |
| The blended classroom (ie, watching the online Osmosis videos before coming to class) allowed me to reflect on a deeper level…more so than a traditional lecture-based course | 197 (84.9) | 63 (77.8) | 33 (84.6) | 101 (90.2) | .01 |
| The Osmosis self-assessment questions were helpful to my learning | 177 (76.3) | 48 (59.3) | 32 (82.1) | 97 (86.6) | <.001 |
| I prefer the Osmosis videos to traditional lectures (live or via Panopto recordings) | 134 (57.8) | 32 (39.5) | 20 (51.3) | 82 (73.2) | <.001 |
| I prefer the Cane Academy videos to traditional lectures (live or via Panopto recordings) | 127 (54.7) | 43 (53.1) | 18 (46.2) | 66 (58.9) | .16 |
aMD 2022 and MD/MPH 2022 took the class in the spring of 2019 and MD 2023 took the class in the spring of 2020.
bP values are based on the χ2 test for proportions across the 3 classes.