Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):1240. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101240

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A). Effects of different irradiance ratios of aBL and aPDT in the dual-light aPDT system in three-day S. aureus biofilm. Three-day S. aureus biofilm, single dose, aBL vs. dual-light 1:3 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.17; aBL vs. dual-light 1:1 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 1.0; aBL vs. dual-light 3:1 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.0001; aPDT vs. dual-light 1:3 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.0022; aPDT vs. dual-light 1:1 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.0022; aPDT vs. dual-light 3:1 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.0001; aBL vs. aPDT, p = 0.13; dual-light aPDT: 1:3 aBL/aPDT ratio vs. 1:1 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.011; 1:3 aBL/aPDT ratio vs. 3:1 aBL/aPDT ratio, p = 0.0001; 1:1 aBL/aPDT ratio vs. 3:1 aBL/aPDT ratio; p = 0.0001. The y-axis displays the median of CFUs. Six assays were performed for each experiment, and the control biofilm was performed in three assays. The 95% confidence interval (CI) is presented by using t-bars. (B). A schematic representation of the experiment.