. 2021 Oct 1;5(10):e2021GH000478. doi: 10.1029/2021GH000478

Table 3.

Results of Factor Analysis for Medium Metro and Small Metro Urban Types

Factors	I	II	III	IV		I	II	III
Disability	*0.81*	0.18	0.13	0.14	Class1/Land	*0.92*	0.21
Low education	*0.60*	0.20	0.22	−0.26	Class2/Land	*−0.93*	−0.20
Language	0.12		*0.68*		disability		*0.89*
Over 60	−0.20	−0.10	−0.20	*0.60*	Low education		0.29	*0.73*
Over60/alone	0.22	*0.56*	0.17	0.36	language		−0.18	*0.78*
below poverty	*0.66*	0.46	0.40		Over 60	−0.27		−0.30
Race/noWhite	*0.56*		*0.75*		Over60/alone	0.35	*0.59*
Developed/Open	−0.15	−0.40		0.24	below poverty	0.30	*0.60*	0.31
Developed/Low	0.12	−0.16		0.35	Race/noWhite		0.13	*0.50*
Developed/Med	0.19	*0.50*	0.10	−0.22
Developed/High		*0.78*		−0.19

Medium metro (n = 280)					Small metro (n = 85)
Medium metro (n = 280)					I	II	III
SS loadings	1.94	1.66	1.35	0.86	1.99	1.71	1.59
Proportion Var	0.18	0.15	0.12	0.08	0.22	0.19	0.18
Cumulative Var	0.18	0.33	0.45	0.53	0.22	0.41	0.59

Note. Top tables show the factor loadings of each variable. Bottom tables contain sum of the squared loadings on first row (SS loading), The variance captured by each factor in the second row, and cumulative captured variances in the third row. Absolute values > 0.49 are the most significant loadings on that factor. All models show p‐value < 0.0001 for model‐based χ² test.