Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 19;13(20):5239. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205239

Table 1.

The efficacy of targeted therapy for thymic carcinoma in clinical trials.

Authors Phase Agents Target Number of Patients ORR (%) DCR (%) PFS (Months) OS (Months)
Palmieri et al. [64] II Imatinib KIT 3 0 0 3 a NR
Giaccone et al. [65] II Imatinib KIT 5 0 0 2 a 4 a
Thomas et al. [38] II Sunitinib VEGFR, KIT, PDGFR, Flt-3 24 26 91 7.2 NR
Remon et al. [67] retrospective Sunitinib VEGFR, KIT, PDGFR, Flt-3 20 20 55 3.3 12.3
Pagano et al. [69] retrospective Sorafenib RAF, VEGFR, KIT, PDGFR, 5 40 80 6.4 21.2
Sato et al. [37] II Lenvatinib VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, KIT, RET 42 38 95 9.3 NR
Zucali et al. [44] II Everolimus mTOR 19 10.5 77.8 5.6 14.7
Kurup et al. [81] II Gefitinib EGFR 7 0 NA NA NA
Bedano et al. [80] II Elrotinib, bevacizumab EGFR, VEGF 7 0 NA NA NA
Giaccone et al. [83] II Belinostat HDAC 16 0 50 2.7 12.4
Palmieri et al. [87] II Octreotide and PSL Somatostatin receptor 6 37 a 75 a 14 a 15 a
Loehrer et al. [26] II Octreotide and/without PSL Somatostatin receptor 6 0 67.1 4.5 23.4

a Data of both thymic carcinoma and thymoma. Abbreviations: ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; NR, not reached; NA, not available.