Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 6;11(10):1324. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101324

Table 4.

Summary of MVGC analysis. Each cell contains the MCD (above) and associated p-value (below in parentheses). For participant and mean MCDs, an asterisk (*) indicates significance after Bonferroni correction for multiple tests. Mean MCD was also calculated across participants for each granger-causal paired relationship, indicating the general relative magnitude of the causality. The bottom row shows Fisher’s χ2 and corresponding p-value for the null hypothesis of zero information transfer occurring across the group, as a whole, compared against adjusted α = 0.016.

Resp Pupil Resp Fz Pupil Resp Pupil Fz Fz Resp Fz Pupil
P1 0.00021
(0.61)
0.00027
(0.32)
0.00025
(0.43)
0.00023
(0.51)
0.00018
(0.74)
0.00022
(0.54)
P2 0.0017
(<0.0001) *
0.0016
(<0.0001) *
0.048
(<0.0001) *
0.0009
(0.27)
0.0011
(0.036)
0.0007
(0.79)
P3 0.0009
(0.23)
0.0018
(<0.0001) *
0.006
(<0.0001) *
0.0009
(0.28)
0.0024
(<0.0001) *
0.0016
(0.0001) *
P4 0.0005
(0.01) *
0.0065
(<0.0001) *
0.0019
(<0.0001) *
0.0245
(<0.0001) *
0.0022
(<0.0001) *
0.0010
(<0.0001) *
P5 0.0005
(0.001) *
0.0002
(0.41)
<0.0001
(>0.99)
0.0003
(0.08)
0.2870
(<0.00001) *
0.0005
(<0.0001) *
P6 0.0003
(0.03)
0.0112
(<0.0001) *
0.0062
(<0.0001) *
0.0003
(0.03)
0.0373
(<0.0001) *
0.0004
(0.004) *
P7 0.0005
(0.95)
0.0013
(0.001) *
0.0006
(0.69)
0.0007
(0.45)
0.002
(<0.0001) *
0.001
(0.08)
P8 0.0005
(0.44)
0.0017
(<0.0001) *
0.0015
(<0.0001) *
0.0005
(0.33)
0.0059
(<0.0001) *
0.0005
(0.42)
P9 0.0030
(<0.0001) *
0.0008
(0.098)
0.0483
(<0.0001) *
0.0002
(>0.99)
0.0007
(0.24)
0.0009
(0.01) *
P10 0.0011
(<0.001) *
0.0028
(<0.0001) *
0.0008
(0.06)
0.0005
(0.66)
0.0590
(<0.0001) *
0.0010
(0.002) *
Mean MCD 0.00106 0.002817 0.011365 0.002903 0.039778 0.000782
Fisher’s χ2 (p-value) 86.3
(<0.0001) *
133.05
(<0.0001) *
118.60
(<0.0001) *
41.64
(0.0031) *
143.65
(<0.0001) *
96.43
(<0.0001) *