Table 3. Linear mixed model outputs of internet speed affecting latency, with categorical frequency predictors.
| Categorical frequency predictors | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Predictors | Estimates | CI | Statistic |
| (Intercept) | 7.0018 | 6.9536 – 7.0499 | 284.9024 |
| Trial | -0.0017 | -0.0058 – 0.0024 | -0.8083 |
| Upload speed | -0.0217 | -0.0826 – 0.0392 | -0.6980 |
| Word freq | -0.0271 | -0.0439 – -0.0103 | -3.1613 |
| Phonotactic freq | -0.0053 | -0.0219 – 0.0112 | -0.6342 |
| Download speed | -0.0380 | -0.1073 – 0.0313 | -1.0740 |
| Upload speed*word freq | -0.0011 | -0.0079 – 0.0058 | -0.3062 |
| Upload speed*phonotactic freq | 0.0016 | -0.0039 – 0.0070 | 0.5637 |
| Word*phonotactic freq | 0.0014 | -0.0151 – 0.0179 | 0.1672 |
| Word freq*download speed | -0.0035 | -0.0111 – 0.0042 | -0.8945 |
| Phonotactic freq*download speed | -0.0022 | -0.0083 – 0.0038 | -0.7182 |
| Upload speed*word freq*phonotactic freq | 0.0032 | -0.0022 – 0.0086 | 1.1569 |
| Download speed*word freq*phonotactic freq | -0.0007 | -0.0068 – 0.0054 | -0.2261 |
| Random Effects | |||
| Residual variance | 0.0254 | ||
| Item intercept | 0.0143 | ||
| Participant intercept | 0.0206 | ||
| Word freq by partciipant | 0.0001 | ||
| Correlation between participant intercept and word freq | 0.4062 | ||
| N participant | 39 | ||
| N item | 217 | ||
| Observations | 6009 | ||
Statistics are t values, and those in bold are above the significance threshold of |2|. Freq: frequency