Table 3.
(A) Steps (Pathway) | B | SE | OR | 95% CI | p | Sobel Test | |
Lower | Upper | z (p) | |||||
Step 1 (a). I (1Q) → M | 0.532 | 0.151 | 1.702 | 1.264 | 2.292 | 0.001 | 2.373 (0.017) |
(b) M → G | −0.417 | 0.169 | 0.664 | 0.475 | 0.928 | 0.017 | |
Step 2 (c). I (1Q) → G | 0.572 | 0.174 | 1.772 | 1.257 | 2.498 | 0.001 | |
Step 3 (c’). I (1Q) → G | 0.552 | 0.172 | 1.736 | 1.235 | 2.440 | 0.002 | |
(B) Steps (Pathway) | B | SE | OR | 95% CI | p | Sobel Test | |
Lower | Upper | z (p) | |||||
Step 1 (a). E (1E) → M | 0.494 | 0.165 | 1.639 | 1.184 | 2.271 | 0.003 | 2.489 (0.012) |
(b) M → G | −0.407 | 0.172 | 0.665 | 0.474 | 0.935 | 0.019 | |
Step 2 (c). E (E) → G | 0.862 | 0.187 | 2.368 | 1.635 | 3.429 | <0.001 | |
Step 3 (c’). E (E) → G | 0.837 | 0.187 | 2.309 | 1.596 | 3.342 | <0.001 |
B, estimate; SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; I (1Q), household income (1Q, reference: 4Q); E (E), education (elementary school, reference: college/university); M, muscle exercise; G, grip strength; HGS, handgrip strength; SES, socioeconomic status. Pathway a, the relationship between the independent and mediating variables; pathway b, the relevance between the mediating and dependent variables; pathway c, the relevance between the independent and dependent variables; pathway c’, the relevance between the independent and dependent variables. Pathways were calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.