Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 14;18(20):10768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010768

Table A2.

Full text excluded studies with reasons (n = 122).

References of Excluded Studies from Full Manuscript Search Reason Excluded
Adamle et al. [93] wrong study design
Adams et al. [94] wrong study design
Adams et al. [95] wrong study design
Alonso [96] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Anderson [97] wrong outcome measures
Anonymous [98] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Anonymous [99] wrong study design
Ashton [100] wrong study design
Baghain et al. [101] wrong study design
Bajorek [102] wrong outcomes
Barker et al. [103] wrong outcomes
Barker et al. [104] wrong outcomes
Barker et al. [105] wrong study design
Barlow et al. [106] wrong intervention
Basil et al. [107] wrong study design
Behnke et al. [108] wrong study design
Bell [2] wrong study design
Beutler et al. [109] wrong study design
Biery [110] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Binfet et al. [111] wrong study design
Binfet et al. [112] wrong study design
Binfet et al. [113] no comparator
Bjick [114] wrong study design
Blender [115] wrong intervention
Brelsford et al. [13] wrong population
Broeyer et al. [116] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Buttelmann et al. [117] wrong study design
Chakales et al. [118] wrong study design
Chramouleeswaran et al. [119] wrong population
Cieslak [120] wrong outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov [121] wrong intervention
ClinicalTrials.gov [122] wrong outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov [123] wrong outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov [124] not included as trial still ongoing
Colarelli et al. [125] wrong intervention
Coleman et al. [126] wrong outcomes
Crago et al. [127] wrong study design
Crossman et al. [6] wrong study design
Crossman et al. [36] wrong study design
Crump et al. [21] wrong study design
Daltry et al. [34] wrong study design
Delgado et al. [128] wrong study design
Dell et al. [129] wrong study design
Dhooper et al. [130] wrong study design
Dluzynski [131] wrong outcomes
Duffey T [132] wrong study design
Flaherty [133] wrong intervention
Folse et al. [134] wrong study design
Frederick [135] wrong population
Frederick et al. [136] wrong population
Friedmann et al. [137] wrong outcomes
Gonzalez-Ramirez et al. [138] wrong outcomes
Goodkind et al. [139] wrong population
Gress [140] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Haggerty et al [141] wrong study design
Hammer et al. [142] wrong study design
Hemingway et al. [143] wrong study design
Henry [144] wrong intervention
House et al. [145] wrong study design
Ishimura et al. [146] wrong intervention
Jarolmen et al. [147] wrong outcomes
Johnson [148] wrong study design
King [149] wrong study design
Kobayashi et al. [150] wrong outcomes
Kronholz et al. [151] wrong study design
Kuzara et al. [152] wrong outcomes
Lacoff et al. [153] wrong study design
Lauriente et al. [154] wrong study design
Lephart et al. [155] wrong study design
Linden [156] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Litwiller et al. [157] wrong study design
Machova et al. [158] wrong study design
Malakoff [159] wrong population
Manor [160] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Marino [161] wrong study design
Matsuura et al. [162] wrong intervention
McArthur et al. [163] wrong study design
McCrindle [164] criteria for inter-library loan not met
McDonald et al. [165] wrong intervention
Merritt [166] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Morrison [15] wrong study design
Morgan [167] wrong study design
Muckle et al. [168] wrong study design
Muellmann et al. [169] wrong study design
Nocentini et al. [170] wrong study design
Pendry et al. [171] wrong outcomes
Pendry et al. [172] wrong outcomes
Pendry et al. [173] wrong outcomes
Pendry et al. [174] wrong outcomes
Pendry et al. [175] wrong intervention
Perry et al. [176] wrong study design
Picard [177] wrong intervention
Polking et al. [178] wrong study design
Quinn et al. [179] wrong study design
Ralston et al. [180] wrong study design
Renne et al. [181] wrong study design
Robino et al. [182] wrong study design
Robson [183] wrong study design
Rose [184] wrong study design
Sanford [185] wrong study design
Silas et al. [186] wrong study design
Sola-Perkins [187] wrong population
Stewart et al. [188] wrong intervention
Stewart et al. [189] wrong study design
Straatman et al. [190] wrong intervention
Swan [191] criteria for inter-library loan not met
Taylor et al. [192] wrong study design
Thelwell [193] wrong intervention
Thew [194] wrong outcomes
Tobin [195] wrong population
Tomaszewska et al. [196] wrong study design
Trammell [197] wrong outcomes
Turner et al. [198] wrong study design
Voelpel et al. [199] wrong study design
Walsh [200] wrong study design
Wheeler et al. [201] wrong intervention
Williams et al. [202] wrong outcomes
Wilson [203] not available due to COVID-19
Wilson [204] not available due to COVID-19
Wood et al [205] no comparator
Young [206] wrong reporting of outcomes
Zents et al. [207] wrong population

(Exclusion criteria were according to the methods. Additionally, if not correct study design and reported in a chapter, book or letter, was categorised as the wrong study design; wrong outcomes included wrong type of reporting outcome (e.g., anecdotal with no empirical data included) as well as wrong sequence of measuring outcomes; wrong intervention also included if stressor was not student-specific).