Table 8.
Comparisons of ranks for the factors in the second level based on the AHP–BWM model and conventional AHP.
| Factor | Final Weight of AHP–BWM |
Rank | Final Weight of AHP Approach |
Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traffic volume | 0.1771 | 1 | 0.1819 | 1 |
| Traffic composition | 0.0554 | 8 | 0.0578 | 8 |
| Following distance | 0.0711 | 6 | 0.0690 | 6 |
| Speed | 0.1521 | 2 | 0.1425 | 2 |
| Vehicle type | 0.0592 | 7 | 0.0635 | 7 |
| Carelessness | 0.0528 | 10 | 0.0528 | 10 |
| Illiteracy | 0.0235 | 13 | 0.0235 | 13 |
| Violation of rules | 0.0824 | 4 | 0.0824 | 4 |
| Training | 0.0548 | 9 | 0.0548 | 9 |
| Road type | 0.1095 | 3 | 0.1095 | 3 |
| Road surface | 0.0404 | 11 | 0.0404 | 11 |
| Grade | 0.0335 | 12 | 0.0335 | 12 |
| Daytime light | 0.0742 | 5 | 0.0742 | 5 |
| Night light | 0.0142 | 14 | 0.0142 | 14 |