Table 2.
Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | t | p | B | t | p | ||
Covariates | |||||||
Intercept | 2.15 | 0.03 * | 0.74 | 0.45 | |||
Age | 0.08 | 1.48 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 10.71 | 0.09 | |
Level of education a | |||||||
Higher school | −0.01 | −0.08 | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.58 | |
More than higher school | −0.18 | −1.22 | 0.22 | −0.02 | −0.19 | 0.85 | |
Occupation b | |||||||
Unemployed student | −0.06 | −0.63 | 0.52 | 0.02 | 0.19 | 0.85 | |
Employed student | −0.12 | −1.35 | 0.17 | −0.03 | −0.40 | 0.69 | |
Employed part time | 0.04 | 0.86 | 0.38 | 0.04 | 0.69 | 0.49 | |
Employed full time | −0.14 | −1.89 | 0.58 | −0.11 | −10.66 | 0.10 | |
Relationship status c | |||||||
Partnered | −0.09 | −1.94 | 0.52 | −0.03 | −0.62 | 0.54 | |
Cohabit | 0.06 | 1.01 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 10.01 | 0.31 | |
Family status d | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 10.07 | ||
Living setup e | |||||||
Friends/Housemates | 0.16 | 2.11 | 0.03 * | 0.13 | 10.78 | 0.08 | |
Partner | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 0.92 | 0.36 | |
Family members | 0.30 | 3.27 | 0.001 *** | 0.23 | 20.76 | 0.01 ** | |
Predictors | |||||||
IPPA | Attachment to Mother | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.76 | |||
Attachment to Father | −0.19 | −40.13 | 0.000 *** | ||||
Attachment to Peers | −0.13 | −20.73 | 0.01 ** | ||||
TAS-20 | 0.34 | 70.40 | 0.000 *** | ||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.07 | 0.28 | |||||
R2 change | 0.10 | 0.20 | |||||
F for R2 change | 3.81 ** | 32.93 *** |
Note. a Less than higher school is the reference group, b Unemployed is the reference group, c Single is the reference group, d Intact family is the reference group, e Living alone is the reference group; SE= Standard error; IPPA = Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment; TAS-20 = Total scale of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale; Coefficients shown are standardized regression coefficients. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.