Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 27;118(35):e2104559118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104559118

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effect of metamodeling on model accuracy (systematic error) and precision (random error). (A) Statistical dependency of the output systematic error (err¯) of the variable ktVE in the vesicle exocytosis model on the input systematic error of the variable GbPR in the postprandial response model. The coupling coefficient corresponds to the slope of the line. (B) The output systematic error of ktVE given different input systematic errors of ktVE and GbPR. (C) Statistical dependency of the output random error (σ) of ktVEon the input random error of GbPR. (D) The overlap between input and output ktVE, as a function of input systematic error (x axis) and random error (y axis) of GbPR. Conflicting models correspond to the red areas. (EG) The input and output PDFs of ktVEcorresponding to points E, F, and G in D, respectively. Arrow in D indicates the direction of resolving conflict by improving the accuracy in input GbPR. All output values are at t = 100 min.