Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;231(8):481–485. doi: 10.1038/s41415-021-3526-6

Table 2.

Odds ratio of true positive and true negative rates of the experimental group compared to the control group with 95% confidence intervals

Statistic True positive rate (sensitivity) detection of enamel-only proximal caries True negative rate (specificity) identification of healthy surfaces
Detected Undetected Total Detected Undetected Total
Experimental 591 189 780 2,470 422 2,892
Control 317 398 715 2,553 98 2,651
Correctly identified in experimental 75.8% 85.4%
Correctly identified in control 44.3% 96.3%
Relative risk (95% confidence interval) 1.71 (1.56, 1.87) 0.89 (0.87, 0.90)