Table 6.
NVP dose | Ani-mal (number) | Indi-vidual viability (%) | Viability (%) (mean ± SD) |
Hedgehogs/100 cells (mean ± SD) | TI (%)b | TI (%) (mean ± SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 ppm | 1 | 97 | 98 ± 1 | 6 ± 3 | 1.2 | 1.2 ± 0.47 |
2 | 99 | 1.0 | ||||
3 | 99 | 2.1 | ||||
4 | 99 | 0.8 | ||||
5 | 98 | 1.0 | ||||
6 | 98 | 0.9 | ||||
5 ppm | 7 | 98 | 98 ± 1 | 4 ± 3 | 1.9 | 1,1 ± 0.61 |
8 | 97 | 1.8 | ||||
9 | 99 | 0.6 | ||||
10 | 99 | 0.7 | ||||
11 | 97 | 0.7 | ||||
12 | 100 | 0.8 | ||||
10 ppm | 13 | 99 | 98 ± 2 | 7 ± 5 | 5.7 | 1.8 ± 1.94 |
14 | 99 | 1.3 | ||||
15 | 98 | 1.2 | ||||
16 | 99 | 0.7 | ||||
17 | 93 | 1.0 | ||||
18 | 99 | 1.1 | ||||
20 ppm | 19 | 100 | 99 ± 1 | 3 ± 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.28 |
20 | 100 | 0.9 | ||||
21 | 98 | 0.9 | ||||
22 | 97 | 0.6 | ||||
23 | 99 | 0.3 | ||||
24 | 100 | 0.4 | ||||
EMSc (Positivecontrol) |
49 | 99 | 99 ± 1 | 9 ± 4 | 20.7 | 19.3 ± 5.15 |
50 | 99 | 14.6 | ||||
51 | 99 | 26.5 | ||||
52 | 100 | 13.1 | ||||
53 | 99 | 23.3 | ||||
54 | 98 | 17.8 |
aconventional assays (no FPG added)
bmean of medians from 2 slides, each carrying 50 evaluated cells
cEMS, ethyl methanesulfonate