Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;12:6147. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26364-y

Table 3.

Probabilities describing the relationship between flashfm ranks of causal variants when the trait correlation is mis-specified.

Trait 1 (E+G)
Pr(matched ranks) Pr(matched or improved ranks)
Trait correlation shift rs1980422/E rs3087243/G rs1980422/E rs3087243/G
−0.2 0.870 0.923 0.960 0.950
−0.1 0.903 0.950 0.970 0.967
    0.1 0.897 0.950 0.933 0.983
    0.2 0.793 0.900 0.857 0.947
Trait 2 (E+H)
Pr(ranks match) Pr(matched or improved ranks)
Trait correlation shift rs1980422/E rs231775/H rs1980422/E rs231775/H
−0.2 0.850 0.913 0.940 0.977
−0.1 0.893 0.937 0.953 0.987
    0.1 0.870 0.960 0.920 0.973
    0.2 0.760 0.897 0.837 0.927

Two traits were simulated to have causal variants E+G and E+H and trait correlation 0.4; sample size is N = 3000. Comparisons are made between flashfm results using the estimated trait correlation as input and flashfm results with this trait correlation estimate shifted upwards/downwards by 0.1 or 0.2. The region has 1231 SNPS and was simulated to mimic the LD structure of the CTLA4 region, 2q-204446258-204816382 (GRCh37/hg19). Results are based on 300 replications.