Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 10;11(10):1066. doi: 10.3390/life11101066

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards analyses of TACE plus sorafenib versus TACE alone on PFS and OS.

Analysis HR 95% CI p-Value
PFS
Unadjusted 0.622 0.459 0.842 0.002
Adjusted 0.651 0.476 0.890 0.007
Propensity score matched * 0.463 0.310 0.693 <0.001
Propensity score matched and adjusted for selected variables † 0.443 0.286 0.687 <0.001
OS
Unadjusted 0.701 0.514 0.955 0.024
Adjusted 0.750 0.543 1.035 0.080
Propensity score matched * 0.583 0.399 0.853 0.005
Propensity score matched and adjusted for selected variables ‡ 0.574 0.377 0.872 0.009

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival. * Cox proportional hazard models, with robust standard errors that accounted for the clustering of matched pairs. † Adjusted for tumor number, tumor extent, bilirubin, and Child–Pugh score, which were significant in the univariable analysis. ‡ Adjusted for maximal tumor size, tumor number, tumor extent, bilirubin, Child–Pugh score, and AFP, which were significant in the univariable analysis.