Table 5.
Author (Year) | Interventions | Dosage | Delivery Approach | Significant Findings |
Hu et al. (2021) [21] |
|
|
Implantable hydrogel system | Hydrogel systems containing HA showed significantly higher new bone formation compared to blank control, especially in the presence of HA-D, M, and Cal |
Jia et al. (2021) [22] |
|
|
Implantable scaffold | Defects implanted with nHA scaffolds have higher new bone formation compared to blank control, which barely showed any bone regeneration |
Luo et al. (2019) [31] |
|
|
Implantable hydrogel system | The defect implanted with OSA–CS–PHA hydrogel showed large areas of new bone formation compared to the blank control and OSA–CS–Borax hydrogel implant |
Tavakoli-Darestani et al. (2014) [27] |
|
|
Implantable bioceramic | Defects implanted with HA bioceramics (with and without Dex) showed bone regeneration compared to blank control, which did not show any bone regeneration |
Abbreviations: HA, nHA—nano-hydroxyapatite; HA-D—polydopamine coating nano-hydroxyapatite; PCL-PEG-NH2—amino-terminated poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(epsilon-caprolactone) copolymers; M—PCL-PEG-NH2 copolymers micelle; Cal—calcitriol; nHA-MS—nHA surface coated with mesoporous silica thin film; Dex—dexamethasone; OSA-CS—sodium alginate–chitosan; PHA—polydopamine-decorated nHA; DDP—cisplatin; Dex/HA—dexamethasone-loaded hydroxyapatite particles.