Table 4.
Study Author | Study Year | Total No. of Patients | Total No. of Studies | Study Type | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xu et al. [31] | 2017 | 13,506,643 | 21 | Meta-analysis of cohort studies | “The pooled analysis results for men indicated that the comparison of DM versus non-DM individuals showed a harmful effect (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.06–1.42; p = 0.005, whereas there was no significant difference in women (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.95–1.61; p = 0.119)”. |
Zhu et al. [32] | 2013 | 14,885,014+ | 29 | Meta-analysis of cohort studies | “The positive association was observed for both men (RR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.30–1.82) and women (RR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.05–2.14)”. “In analysis stratified by study design, the summary RR was 1.29 (95% CI 1.20–1.39) in cohort studies. However, diabetes was not associated with mortality from bladder cancer in cohort studies of diabetic patients (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.58–2.43)”. |