Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 14;10(20):4723. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204723

Table 5.

Cerebral palsy studies: design and outcome parameters.

Author, Year, Country Design Subjects/Grouping Follow-up Parameter Safety
Amelio 2010, Italy [43] Prospective,
placebo-controlled study
n = 12 Immediately after placebo, immediately after ESST, 1 wk, 4 wks, 12 wks MAS (+)
PROM (+)
Pedobarometric
assessment (+)
NM
Vidal 2011, Spain [44] Placebo-controlled clinical trial n = 15 1 mo, 2 mos, 3 mos MAS (+)
ROM (+)
NM
Gonkova 2013, Italy [45] Observational study n = 25 2 wks, 4 wks MAS (+), PROM (+)
Baropodometric measurements (+)
NM
Wang 2016, China [46] Case-control study rESWT (n = 34)
Control (n = 32)
1 mo, 3 mos MAS (+)
PROM (+)
GMFM-88 (−)
No adverse effect
Lin 2018, China [47] RCT rESWT (n = 43)
Control (n = 39)
2 wks, 1 mo GMFM (+), MAS (+)
Plantar area and pressure (+)
NM
Park 2018, Korea [48] RCT (a pilot study) 1 ESWT (n = 6)
3 ESWT (n = 6)
Immediately after the first and third ESWT, 4 wks MAS (+)
PROM (+)
Sonoelastography (+)
No adverse effect
Vidal 2020, Germany [49] RCT, cross-over study * BTX-A (n = 33)
rESWT (n = 35)
3 wks, 2 mos, 3 mos Tardieu scale, with goniometer (+) NM

Abbreviations: +: statistically significant, −: statistically not significant mo: month; wk: week; RCT: randomized controlled trial; ESWT: extracorporeal shock therapy; rESWT: radial extracorporeal shock therapy; MAS: modified Ashworth scale; PROM: passive range of motion; GMFM-88: gross motor function measure-88, NM: not mentioned. * Crossover six months later.