Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 9;13(20):3469. doi: 10.3390/polym13203469

Table 1.

Mechanical properties of tested materials with authorized type of restoration compared to enamel and dentine (* manufacturer’s information).

Products (Code) Composition Micro-
Hardness
Vickers
Elastic
Modulus
GPa
Flexural Strength
MPa
Bis-acryl composite
resins
Structur 3 (S3) UDMA, Bis-GMA,
Filler: Fumed silica (50 nm) [26], 32 wt% [27]
13 [27] 1.9 113 *
(3-point)
142 *
(biaxial)
LuxaCrown (LC) Dimethacrylate Resin 35–45 wt%,
filler content 46 wt% (with Ø 0.02–1.5 µm) *
/ / 154 *
110 [28]
Resin
composites (CAD/CAM discs)
Structur CAD (SC)
/ / / >120 *
VITA CAD-Temp (CT) PMMA, 14 wt%
microfillers (SiO2) [29]
25 [29]
25 [30]
3.62.8 [31] 88.5 [31]
(3-point)
Grandio disc (GD) Dimethacrylates, 86 wt%
glass ceramic
filler; functionalized
155 * 18 * 333 *
Zirconia Lava Esthetic (LE) 5 mol% Yttria-stabilized Cubic Zirconia Polycrystal [32] 1200 * 216 * 800
(3-point) *
Enamel / / 313.3 [15] 59.7 [15] /
Dentin / / 62.3 [15] 16.5 [15] /