Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 22;22(Suppl 10):515. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04404-0

Table 3.

The F1 score, MCC and AUC of subcellular location prediction generated by model BLSTM, BLSTM + ConvNet1, ConvNet2 and BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2

D3106 D4802
F1 MCC AUC F1 MCC AUC
BLSTM 0.7473 0.6001 0.9242 0.7419 0.5705 0.9121
BLSTM + ConvNet1 0.7775 0.6419 0.9255 0.7801 0.6284 0.9327
ConvNet2 0.6475 0.4819 0.8785 0.6696 0.4259 0.9297
BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2 0.7843 0.6410 0.9458 0.7842 0.6411 0.9434

The four models were tested on datasets D3106 and D4802. On dataset D3106, the highest F1 score and AUC are achieved by the model BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2, while the model BLSTM + ConvNet1 has the highest MCC. On dataset D4802, the model BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2 was the best among the four models