Table 3.
The F1 score, MCC and AUC of subcellular location prediction generated by model BLSTM, BLSTM + ConvNet1, ConvNet2 and BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2
| D3106 | D4802 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | MCC | AUC | F1 | MCC | AUC | |
| BLSTM | 0.7473 | 0.6001 | 0.9242 | 0.7419 | 0.5705 | 0.9121 |
| BLSTM + ConvNet1 | 0.7775 | 0.6419 | 0.9255 | 0.7801 | 0.6284 | 0.9327 |
| ConvNet2 | 0.6475 | 0.4819 | 0.8785 | 0.6696 | 0.4259 | 0.9297 |
| BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2 | 0.7843 | 0.6410 | 0.9458 | 0.7842 | 0.6411 | 0.9434 |
The four models were tested on datasets D3106 and D4802. On dataset D3106, the highest F1 score and AUC are achieved by the model BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2, while the model BLSTM + ConvNet1 has the highest MCC. On dataset D4802, the model BLSTM + ConvNet1 + ConvNet2 was the best among the four models