Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):2159. doi: 10.3390/plants10102159

Table 1.

Physical–chemical characteristics in Colombian quinoa grains.

Cultivars L* a* b* Protein Carbohydrates Fat
Titicaca 53.50 ± 0.58 d 4.05 ± 0.08 b 23.84 ± 0.04 b 14.63 ± 0.30 a 49.36 ± 0.70 c 5.7 ± 0.30 c
Salcedo 73.59 ± 0.52 a 1.51 ± 0.03 e 18.14 ± 0.05 e 13.36 ± 0.47 b 59.63 ± 0.47 ab 6.76 ± 0.25 ab
Soracá 69.40 ± 0.90 b 1.93 ± 0.16 d 21.12 ± 0.21 c 14.10 ± 0.26 ab 57.30 ± 0.70 b 6.1 ± 0.1 c
Pasankalla 30.78 ± 0.46 e 10.4 ± 0.24 a 11.92 ± 0.26 f 14. 46 ± 0.14 a 57.30 ± 1.05 b 6.76 ± 0.25 ab
Puno 54.03 ± 0.22 d 1.32 ± 0.19 e 18.99 ± 0.16 d 11.73 ± 0.30 c 61.06 ± 0.51 a 7 ± 0.1 a
Nariño 62.29 ± 0.34 c 3.56 ± 0.04 c 25.59 ± 0.04 a 11.36 ± 0.30 c 62.53 ± 2.05 a 6.26 ± 0.15 bc

Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters had significant differences (p < 0.05) using Tukey’s test.