Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):2159. doi: 10.3390/plants10102159

Table 3.

Secondary protein structures in six Colombian quinoa cultivars.

Cultivars β-Sheet-1
(1624 cm−1)
β-Sheet-2
(1627 cm−1)
β-Sheet-3
(1635 cm−1)
Random Coil
(1648 cm−1)
α Elice
(1656 cm−1)
β-Turns-1
(1667 cm−1)
β-Turns-2
(1675 cm−1)
β-Turns-3
(1680 cm−1)
Titicaca 2.99 ± 0.13 a 2.87 ± 0.07 a 1.09 ± 0.08 c 3.08 ± 0.07 b 1.33 ± 0.07 e 3.53 ± 0.06 a 1.36 ± 0.05 b 0.26 ± 0.05 e
Salcedo 2.14 ± 0.05 b 1.89 ± 0.06 c 3.08 ± 0.07 b 3.35 ± 0.14 ab 3.07 ± 0.07 b 2.14 ± 0.14 b 0.92 ± 0.08 d 0.77 ± 0.05 c
Soracá 0.37 ± 0.04 e 1.49 ± 0.04 d 3.44 ± 0.12 a 3.59 ± 0.14 a 4.97 ± 0.09 a 1.46 ± 0.07 c 0.59 ± 0.01 e 0.33 ± 0.01 de
Puno 0.75 ± 0.04 d 0.17 ± 0.02 e 1.11 ± 0.19 c 1.24 ± 0.1 d 2.56 ± 0.14 c 1.66 ± 0.09 c 1.07 ± 0.04 c 1.31 ± 0.01 b
Pasankalla 0.58 ± 0.02 de 0.08 ± 0.009 e 0.95 ± 0.04 c 2.53 ± 0.1 c 0.14 ± 0.009 f 1.47 ± 0.05 c 0.51 ± 0.03 e 0.5 ± 0.08 d
Nariño 1.1 ± 0.12 c 2.36 ± 0.1 b 3.38 ± 0.13 ab 0.72 ± 0.09 e 1.73 ± 0.07 e 0.57 ± 0.1 d 1.9 ± 0.01 a 3.37 ± 0.09 a

Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters had significant differences (p < 0.05) using Tukey’s test.