Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):2159. doi: 10.3390/plants10102159

Table 4.

Band intensities of starch from different Colombian quinoa cultivars.

Cultivars 996 cm−1 1014 cm−1 1041 cm−1 1076 cm−1 1099 cm−1 1145 cm−1 996/1014 1041/1014
Titicaca 0.9 ± 0.01 b 0.11 ± 0.01 c 0.14 ± 0.004 c 0.99 ± 0.007 a 0.39 ± 0.01 ab 0.53 ± 0.01 a 8.23 ± 0.79 b 1.3 ± 0.08 d
Salcedo 0.98 ± 0.01 a 0.06 ± 0.004 d 0.13 ± 0.006 c 0.96 ± 0.02 b 0.38 ± 0.01 ab 0.46 ± 0.01 b 15.28 ± 1.1 a 2.04 ± 0.12 b
Soracá 0.82 ± 0.01 c 0.06 ± 0.01 d 0.26 ± 0.01 b 0.98 ± 0.005 a 0.33 ± 0.03 c 0.53 ± 0.02 a 14 ± 2.1 a 4.02 ± 0.27 a
Puno 0.97 ± 0.01 a 0.16 ± 0.01 b 0.23 ± 0.01 b 0.86 ± 0.005 c 0.34 ± 0.01 bc 0.4 ± 0.01 c 6.11 ± 0.32 bc 1.48 ± 0.16 cd
Pasankalla 0.81 ± 0.01 c 0.17 ± 0.01 b 0.32 ± 0.004 a 0.99 ± 0.002 a 0.31 ± 0.05 c 0.53 ± 0.01 a 4.81 ± 0.34 c 1.91 ± 0.1 bc
Nariño 0.98 ± 0.01 a 0.22 ± 0.02 a 0.34 ± 0.01 a 0.97 ± 0.005 ab 0.41 ± 0.01 a 0.52 ± 0.01 a 4.51 ± 0.53 c 1.58 ± 0.16 bcd

Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters had significant differences (p < 0.05) using Tukey’s test.