Table 2.

Enantioselective analysis of the EOs with a 2,3-diethyl-6-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-cyclodextrin-based column.

Enantiomers	LRI 1	Cupules		Bark		Leaves
		Enantiomer Ratio (%)	e.e. 2 (%)	Enantiomer Ratio (%)	e.e. 2 (%)	Enantiomer Ratio (%)	e.e. 2 (%)
(1S,5R)-(+)-α-pinene	935	8.8	82.4	u/t	100.0	5.8	88.3
(1S,5S)-(-)-α-pinene	943	91.2		100.0		94.2
(1R,4S)-(-)-camphene	960	100.0	100.0	u/t	–	100.0	100.0
(1R,5R)-(+)-β-pinene	996	23.1	53.8	u/t	100.0	14.1	71.8
(1S,5S)-(-)-β-pinene	999	76.9		100.0		85.9
(1S,5S)-(−)-sabinene	1000	u/t	–	u/t	–	100.0	100.0
(R)-(-)-α-phellandrene	1032	31.8	29.4	100.0	100.0	u/t	–
(S)-(+)-α-phellandrene	1034	61.2		u/t		u/t
(S)-(-)-limonene	1055	u/t	100.0	u/t	–	53.9	7.8
(R)-(+)-limonene	1061	100.0		u/t		46.1
(R)-(-)-linalool	1202	100.0	100.0	u/t	–	100.0	100.0
(S)-(+)-terpinen-4-ol	1273	23.1	53.8	20.9	58.2	100.0	100.0
(R)-(−)-terpinen-4-ol	1275	76.9		79.1		u/t
(S)-(−)-α-terpineol	1309	82.7	65.4	37.1	25.8	u/t	–
(R)-(+)-α-terpineol	1315	17.3		62.9		u/t
(1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-(-)-α-copaene	1379	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0

¹ LRI = Calculated linear retention indices; ² e.e = enantiomeric excess; u/t = undetected or detected as a trace.