Table 7.
The precision of drowsiness detection was obtained with the XGBoost algorithm for each subject in the test set. The shaded green cells with bold text show the highest precision obtained for each subject. At the bottom, the best mean precision for each ratio index is marked in the same way.
Subject | Index1 | Index2 | θ/α | β/α | (θ + α)/β | θ/β | (θ + α)/(α + β) | γ/δ | (γ + β)/(δ + α) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This Work | Eoh et al. [36] | Jap et al. [37] | da Silveira et al. [10] | ||||||
tr04-0653 | 0.5769 | 0.6569 | 0.6742 | 0.5030 | 0.5133 | 0.6000 | 0.5862 | 0.5795 | 0.5914 |
tr05-0028 | 0.3818 | 0.4296 | 0.5178 | 0.5385 | 0.4762 | 0.4214 | 0.5364 | 0.5000 | 0.5862 |
tr05-0332 | 0.7483 | 0.9333 | 0.7905 | 0.5547 | 0.5321 | 0.7846 | 0.6709 | 0.8571 | 0.8824 |
tr07-0127 | 0.5401 | 0.6512 | 0.4722 | 0.5294 | 0.5231 | 0.5000 | 0.3600 | 0.4309 | 0.4207 |
tr08-0157 | 0.5812 | 0.6087 | 0.5158 | 0.5574 | 0.5000 | 0.5048 | 0.5153 | 0.5122 | 0.4886 |
tr09-0328 | 0.6147 | 0.5078 | 0.5650 | 0.5137 | 0.5000 | 0.5041 | 0.5678 | 0.5620 | 0.5372 |
tr09-0453 | 0.5398 | 0.5176 | 0.5436 | 0.5301 | 0.5248 | 0.5306 | 0.5538 | 0.5049 | 0.4721 |
tr12-0255 | 0.5316 | 0.5351 | 0.6054 | 0.5342 | 0.4826 | 0.5393 | 0.5545 | 0.5886 | 0.5389 |
tr12-0441 | 0.8000 | 0.5789 | 0.5633 | 0.5093 | 0.5249 | 0.5478 | 0.5785 | 0.6496 | 0.5231 |
tr13-0170 | 0.6333 | 0.5466 | 0.5724 | 0.5355 | 0.6056 | 0.6296 | 0.5313 | 0.6944 | 0.3478 |
tr13-0508 | 0.4337 | 0.5091 | 0.6331 | 0.5674 | 0.5443 | 0.6154 | 0.6140 | 0.5478 | 0.5352 |
tr13-0653 | 0.7048 | 0.6000 | 0.5177 | 0.5314 | 0.5419 | 0.5213 | 0.5845 | 0.5392 | 0.5037 |
Average | 0.5905 | 0.5896 | 0.5809 | 0.5337 | 0.5224 | 0.5582 | 0.5544 | 0.5805 | 0.5356 |