Table 2.
Processing status analysis of the multi-method framework.
| Test | Status (%) | Result | Actual | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standby | Refueling | Breakdown | Stop | Product A | Product B | |||
| 1 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Standby | Refueling |
| 2 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Standby | Refueling |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Product A | Refueling |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | Product A | Refueling |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 92 | Product B | Breakdown |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 82 | Product B | Breakdown |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Stop | Stop |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | Stop | Stop |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80 | 20 | Product A | Product A |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 22 | Product A | Product A |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 89 | Product B | Product B |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 84 | Product B | Product B |