Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;13(10):3399. doi: 10.3390/nu13103399

Table 3.

Results of studies assessed for the ZSI: LA:DGLA, Zn-related gene expression, and Zn status effects on gut microbiota modulation.

Reference Zn Content
(μg Zn/g)
Zn Status Measures
LA:DGLA
(Erythrocyte)
Zn-Related Gene Expression Gut Microbiota Modulation Other (Not Included in ZSI)
Beasley et al., 2020 [20] Control:
16.6 ± 0.06
(standard wheat)
Biofortified:
19.2 ± 0.03 (nicotianamine-enhanced Zn- and Fe-biofortified wheat)
In the biofortified relative to the control group:
↓ LA:DGLA at 2 weeks
↓ LA:DGLA at 4 weeks onwards (trend, not significant)
In the biofortified relative to the control group:
↔ ZnT1
↔ ZnT5
↔ ZnT7
↔ ZIP1
↔ ZIP4
↔ ZIP6
↔ ZIP9
↔ Δ6-desaturase
In the biofortified relative to the control group:
↓ α-diversity
Change in β-diversity
At the phyla level:
↑ 1.9-fold the proportion of Actinobacteria
↓ 1.2- and 2.0-fold, respectively, the proportion of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria
At the family level:
↑ abundance of Enterococcaceae
↓ 1.7-fold the proportion of Lachnospiraceae
At the genera level:
Enterococcus abundance
Dorea abundance
↑ 1.9- and 1.5-fold, respectively, proportion of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus
↓ proportion of Streptococcus (1.7-fold), Coprococcus (1.4-fold), Ruminococcus (1.2-fold) Faecalibacterium (2-fold), and Escherichia (2-fold)
In the biofortified relative to the control group:
↔ Serum
↔ Liver
↔ Nail
↔ Feathers
Knez et al., 2018 [21] Low Zn:
32.8 ± 0.17
(standard wheat)
High Zn:
46.5 ± 0.99
(Zn-biofortified wheat)
In the high-Zn relative to the low-Zn group:
↓ LA:DGLA (2 weeks onwards)
In the high-Zn relative to the low-Zn group:
↓ ZnT1
↓ ZnT5
↓ ZnT7
↓ ZIP4
↓ ZIP6
↓ ZIP9
↓ Δ6-desaturase
See Reed et al., 2018 [18] In the high-Zn relative to the low-Zn group:
↑ Serum Zn (2 weeks onwards)
↑ Feather Zn
↑ Nail Zn
Reed et al., 2018 [18] Low Zn:
32.8 ± 0.17
(standard wheat)
High Zn:
46.5 ± 0.99
(Zn-biofortified wheat)
See Knez et al., 2018 [21] See Knez et al., 2018 [21] In the high-Zn relative to the low-Zn group:
↔ α-diversity
Change in β-diversity
At the phyla level:
Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria
At the genera level:
Dorea, Clostridiales, unclassified Clostridiales, Ruminococcus, Lachnospiraceae, and unclassified Lachnospiraceae
Lactococcus, Verrucomicrobium, Bacteroides, Bacteroidales, and unclassified Bacteroidales
At the species level:
Lactobacillus reuteri
Akkermansia muciniphila
See Knez et al., 2018 [21]
Reed et al., 2015 [17] Zn deficient:
2.5 ± 0.02
Zn adequate (control):
42 ± 0.25
See Reed et al., 2014 [13] See Reed et al., 2014 [13] In the Zn-adequate relative to the Zn-deficient group:
↑ α-diversity (species richness and diversity)
Changes (expansion) in β-diversity
At the phyla level:
Firmicutes
Proteobacteria
At the family level:
Peptostreptococcaceae and unclassified Clostridiales
Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae
At the genera level:
↑ unclassified Clostridiales and unclassified Peptostreptococcaceae
Enterococcus, unclassified Enterococcus, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, and unclassified Ruminococcaceae
At the species level:
Ruminococcus lactaris, Enterococcus sp., Clostridium lactatifermentans, and Clostridium clostridioforme
Clostridium indolis and an unclassified member of the Bacteroidales (Unclassified S24–7)
See Reed et al., 2014 [13]
Reed et al., 2014 [13] Zn deficient:
2.5 ± 0.02
Zn adequate (control):
42 ± 0.25
In the Zn-adequate relative to the Zn-deficient group:
↓ LA:DGLA (1 week onwards)
In the Zn-adequate relative to the Zn-deficient group:
↔ ZnT1
↔ ZnT5
↔ ZnT7
↔ ZIP6
↔ ZIP9
↑ Δ6-desaturase
See Reed et al., 2015 [17] In the Zn-adequate relative to the Zn-deficient group:
↑ Serum Zn
↑ Feather Zn
↑ Nail Zn

↔no change; ↑ increased; ↓ reduced.