Table 1.
Descriptive statistics for fidelity checklist data per session and sub-scale (N = 26)
| Session 1 M (range) |
Session 2 M (range) |
Session 3 M (range) |
Session 4 M (range) |
Session 5 M (range) |
Session 6 M (range) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistics (%) | 90 (45–100) | 93 (40–100) | 93 (44–100) | 91 (0–100) | 94 (50–100) | 88 (12–100) |
| Counselling (%) | 88 (38–100) | 88 (71–100) | 90 (75–100) | 87 (0–100) | 82 (29–100) | 76 (0–100) |
| Exercise (%) | 85 (0–100) | 94 (25–100) | 100 (100-100) | 96 (0–100) | 88 (0–100) | 88 (0–100) |
| Optional tools (%) | 94 (50–100) | 85 (33–100) | 68 (0–100) | 72 (0–100) | 58 (0–100) | 54 (0–100) |
| Total score (%) | 88 (33–100) | 92 (57–100) | 93 (71–100) | 90 (0–100) | 89 (32–100) | 85 (7–96) |
| Total score with optional tools (%) | 89 (38–100) | 91 (63–100) | 90 (71–100) | 98 (0–100) | 86 (38–100) | 83 (7–97) |
| Missing* (%) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
Note. *If an item was left blank on the checklist, it was deemed missing and no point was awarded. As a conservative measure, missing data was not subtracted from the total count, therefore missing data is equivalent to selecting no.