Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 1;42(6):1577–1589. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046

TABLE 2.

Fixed effect estimates (β) for PPD, together with corresponding CIs

PPD
β CI (95%)
(Intercept) +0.220 +0.181 to +0.259
Intelligibility (A) –0.038 –0.068 to –0.007
Intelligibility (B) –0.044 –0.074 to –0.015
Copresence +0.028 +0.008 to +0.049
Task –0.152 –0.187 to –0.118
Intelligibility (A) × Copresence +0.003 –0.040 to +0.046
Intelligibility (B) × Copresence +0.018 –0.024 to +0.060
Intelligibility (A) × Task +0.044 +0.001 to +0.087
Intelligibility (B) × Task +0.043 +0.001 to +0.085
Copresence × Task –0.023 –0.047 to +0.002
Intelligibility (A) × Copresence × Task –0.002 –0.063 to +0.059
Intelligibility (B) × Copresence × Task –0.034 –0.094 to +0.026

The backward difference contrast coding resulted in two beta estimates for intelligibility, labeled contrast A (50% compared with 20%) and contrast B (80% compared with 50%). Copresence represents the difference in BPS when doing the task in the presence of another participant, compared with alone. The task estimate represents the change in PPD when actively listening, compared with passive listening.

CIs, confidence intervals; PPD, peak pupil dilation.