Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;47:210. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01163-9

Table 3.

Socio-economic, anamnestic, nutritional and environmental data derived from the questionnaire in the responder girls

Group 1 (34/56 responders) Group 2 (16/22 responders)
Questionnaire data 34/56 16/22
Hollingshead SSE 1,2 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.7
Rural Residency 14/34 (41.2%) 5/16 (31.2%)
Urban Residency 20/34 (58.8%) 11/16 (68.8%)
Smoking Mother 6/34 (17.6%) 3/16 (18.7%)
Smoking Father 6/34 (17.6%) 2/16 (12.5%)
Mediterranean Diet 32/34 (94.1%) 15/16 (93.7%)
Vegetarian Diet 2/34 (5.9%) 1/16 (6.3%)
Soy-products 3/34 (8.8%) 0/16 (0%)
AFT 1/34 (2.9%) 0/16 (0%)
Breastfeeding 19/34 (55.8%) 8/16 (50%)
Integrator during breastfeeding 0/34 (0%) 0/16 (0%)
Homeopathic medicine 16/34 (47%) 8/16 (50%)
Homeopathic cough syrup 5/34 (14.7%) 4/16 (25%)*
Homeopathic solution for gas colic 0/34 (0%) 1/16 (6.25%)*
Herbicides and Pesticides exposition 4/34 (11.7%) 3/16 (18.7%)§
Cosmetics containing placenta extract 2/34 (5.9%) 2/16 (12.5%)*

AFT assisted fertilization technique

*p < 0.05 vs Group 1. §p < 0.001 vs Group 1