Table 3.

Social frailty and/or executive dysfunction: Logistic regression against different health outcomes

	Either Executive Dysfunction or Socially Frail						Both Executive Dysfunction and Socially Frail
	Unadjusted Model		Model 1		Model 2		Unadjusted Model		Model 1		Model 2
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Physical Activity
FAI	0.952	0.45–1.99	0.778	0.33–1.83	0.591	0.24–1.48	3.22	0.84–12.30	1.73	0.33–9.06	1.38	0.25–7.50
IPAQ	3.35†	1.67–6.71	3.77†	1.79–7.92	3.23†	1.50–6.94	3.10	0.73–13.15	3.85	0.76–19.62	3.39	0.66–17.46
Physical Frailty and Performance
Modified Fried	2.60†	1.47–4.59	2.64†	1.40–4.97	2.27†	1.18–4.35	6.37†	1.30–31.13	4.18	0.70–25.03	3.52	0.57–21.9
SPPB	3.22†	1.42–7.28	2.49†	1.06–5.89	2.42†	1.00–5.84	1.30	0.15–11.25	0.57	0.06–5.61	0.55	0.05–5.50
Geriatric Syndromes
SNAQ	2.10†	1.20–3.69	2.09†	1.15–3.78	1.77	0.96–3.27	4.77†	1.18–19.29	5.67t	1.26–25.58	4.79†	1.04–22.02
Near Falls/ Falls	1.52	0.74–3.15	1.52	0.71–3.27	1.55	0.71–3.38	4.00†	1.04–15.44	5.13t	1.09–21.17	5.23†	1.10–24.90
Life Space and Quality of Life
LSA	1.50	0.75–2.99	1.56	0.75–3.26	1.43	0.67–3.04	7.63†	1.99–29.19	10.56t	2.26–49.36	9.80†	2.07–46.31
EQ-5D	3.62‡	1.66–7.88	3.35†	1.46–7.68	2.89†	1.23–6.80	10.7‡	2.70–42.13	15.0t	2.79–81.0	13.2†	2.38–73.4

Binary logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) for the association between health outcomes and social frailty dysfunction (SF-ED); Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, years of education, and hypertension; Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, years of education, hypertension and GDS; EQ-5D-5L: five-level dimension EuroQoL questionnaire; FAI: Frenchay Activity Index; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; LSA: Life-Space Assessment; SNAQ: Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire; SPPB: Short Physical Performance Battery; †p<0.05; ‡p<0.01