Skip to main content
. 1999 Sep;37(9):2968–2973. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.9.2968-2973.1999

TABLE 3.

Number of single convalescent-phase sera reactive with and sensitivities and specificities of the various antigen preparationsa

Antigen (testing laboratory) No. of HGE samples reactive/no. tested % Sensitivity (95% CI)b No. of HME samples reactive/no. testedc % Specificity (95% CI) % Specificity without HME
E. equi neutrophils 1 (JHU) 28/28 100 (83–100) 1/4 93 (71–100) 100
E. equi neutrophils 2 (JHU) 23/28 82 (62–90) 0/4 100 (82–100) 100
E. equi HL60 (JHU) 28/28 100 (75–97) 3/4 67 (42–86) 82
Webster strain (JHU) 27/28 96 (79–99) 1/4 93 (79–100) 100
Spooner strain (JHU) 26/28 93 (75–97) 1/4 93 (71–100) 100
NY-8 strain (JHU) 26/28 93 (75–97) 1/4 93 (71–100) 100
NY-3 strain (NY) 21/22 95 (74–98) 1/2 85 (67–100) 91
NY-6 strain (NY) 26/28 93 (71–95) 3/4 73 (49–90) 91
NY-8 strain (NY) 25/28 89 (71–95) 3/4 73 (55–94) 91
HGE-2 strain (MN) 9/9 100 (60–90) 2/3 79 (61–97) 91
a

None of the antigens reacted with sera from the RMSF or scrub typhus patients. 

b

CI, confidence interval. 

c

E. chaffeensis infection.