Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 20;14:4333–4359. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S333818

Table 3.

Performance of mNGS and the Conventional Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fungal Infections

Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI) PPV % (95% CI) NPV % (95% CI) P value P value
mNGS (biopsy) 80.0a,b (65.0–89.9) 91.8A,B (81.2–96.9) 87.8 (73.0–95.4) 86.2 (74.8–93.1) 0.754a 0.388A
mNGS (balf) 84.4a,c (69.9–93.0) 85.3A,C (73.3–92.6) 80.9 (66.3–90.4) 88.1 (76.5–94.7) 0.002b 0.774B
Conventional test 44.44b,c (30.0–59.9) 88.52B,C (77.2–94.9) 74.1 (53.4–88.1) 68.4 (56.8–78.1) 0.0003c 0.774C

Notes: Sensitivity: a, biopsy-mNGS vs BALF-mNGS; b, biopsy-mNGS vs conventional test; c, BALF-mNGS vs conventional test. Specificity: A, biopsy-mNGS vs BALF-mNGS; B, biopsy-mNGS vs conventional test; C, BALF-mNGS vs conventional test.

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.