Table 7.
Descriptive results for groups and group comparisons of teacher variables.
| All | Mostly synchronous | Mostly asynchronous | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | M | SD | n | M | SD | n | M | SD | ANOVA | |
| Evaluation of own teaching | ||||||||||
| Overall satisfaction | 274 | 4.28 | 1.07 | 147 | 4.47 | 1.04 | 73 | 4.17 | 1.03 | F(2, 271)=6.61, p =0.00, η2 =0.04 |
| Additional effort | 272 | 4.79 | 0.92 | 146 | 4.66 | 0.92 | 72 | 5.00 | 0.85 | F(2, 269)=3.56, p =0.03, η2 =0.02 |
| Gain digital competence | 246 | 4.36 | 1.05 | 130 | 4.43 | 1.08 | 71 | 4.46 | 1.02 | F(2,243)=2.98, p =0.05, η2 =0.02 |
| Evaluation of students | ||||||||||
| Additional strains | 228 | 4.27 | 1.27 | 125 | 4.06 | 1.30 | 68 | 4.51 | 1.21 | F(2, 225)=3.79, p =0.02, η2 =0.03 |
| Overburdening by number of tools | 246 | 3.12 | 1.34 | 134 | 2.80 | 1.27 | 73 | 3.50 | 1.25 | F(2, 243)=8.56, p =0.00, η2 =0.06 |
| Problems in organizing learning at home | 222 | 3.48 | 1.23 | 119 | 3.31 | 1.31 | 67 | 3.76 | 1.03 | F(2, 219)=2.79, p =0.06, η2 =0.02 |
All variables were rated from 1 to 6, with 6 indicating higher values.