Table 3.
Traditional H/Q ratio (H/Q) and KF RTD to KE RTD ratio (RTD H/Q) in dominant leg (DL) and non-dominant leg (NDL).
| Variable | DL | NDL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | 95% CI | Mean±SD | 95% CI | |
| Conventional H/Q | ||||
| Hcon60/Qcon60 | 0.56±0.14 | [0.49–0.64] | 0.56±0.08 | [0.51–0.61] |
| Hcon240/Qcon240 | 0.61±0.10 | [0.55–0.67] | 0.60±0.09 | [0.54–0.65] |
| Functional H/Q | ||||
| Hecc30/Qcon60 | 0.75±0.16 | [0.66–0.84] | 0.75±0.08 | [0.70–0.80] |
| Hecc30/Qcon240 | 0.76±0.07 | [0.72–0.80] | 1.13±0.17 | [1.03–1.23] |
| RTD H/Q | ||||
| RTD Hcon/Qcon | 0.81±0.24 | [0.67–0.95] | 0.74±0.15 | [0.66–0.83] |
| RTD Hcon/Qecc | 2.07±0.67 | [1.67–2.46] | 2.45±0.94 | [1.90–2.99] |
Con, concentric contraction; Ecc, eccentric contraction; 240, 240°.s−1; 60, 60°.s−1; 30, −30°.s−1. All data are presented as mean±standard deviation with 95% confidence interval.